iGaming Payment Solutions
Independent directory of payment providers for iGaming operators. Filter by region, payment type, and license.
20 providers · 5 regions · Independent data
Top Rated by iGaming Score
Gateway, Acquiring, Orchestration, Payouts, Risk Management
Unified acquiring, Orchestration, Local methods
Orchestration platform, Visual builder, Vaulting
All Providers
(20 providers)Nuvei
Full-Stack PSPGateway, Acquiring, Orchestration, Payouts, Risk Management
Finera
Payment OrchestratorOrchestration, Smart routing, Analytics
Solidgate
Orchestration + AcquiringUnified acquiring, Orchestration, Local methods
Primer
Payment OrchestratorOrchestration platform, Visual builder, Vaulting
Adyen
Enterprise PSPFull acquiring, Gateway, Risk, Orchestration
Trustly
Open Banking PSPPay N Play, Open Banking, Payouts
Corefy
Payment OrchestratorOrchestration, 600+ connectors, Reconciliation
Inpay
Payout SpecialistInstant Payouts, Open Banking
Paysafe
Full-Stack PSPGateway, Wallets (Skrill, Neteller), Acquiring, Prepaid
NOWPayments
Crypto GatewayCrypto Gateway, Fiat on-ramp, Mass Payouts, Auto-conversion
CoinsPaid
Crypto ProcessorCrypto Gateway, Fiat settlement, Operator tools
CoinPayments
Crypto GatewayCrypto Gateway, Mass payouts, Multi-coin support
CoinGate
Crypto GatewayCrypto Gateway, Fiat settlement, Plugins
Brite
Open BankingDirect Open Banking, Payouts
Worldpay
Card Acquiring PSPCard acquiring, Gateway, Payouts
AstroPay
Local Methods PSPLocal LATAM methods, Wallet, Cash-in
IXOPAY
Payment OrchestratorWhite-label orchestration, Vaulting, Risk
Triple-A
Crypto-to-FiatStablecoin Gateway, Payouts, Zero-volatility conversion
PayRetailers
Local LATAM PSPLocal methods aggregator, Cash-in, Bank transfers
BitPay
Crypto GatewayCrypto payments, Wallet, Fiat settlement
Top 10 iGaming Payment Providers Compared
| Provider | Type | Regions | APMs | Crypto | Settlement | Pricing | Integration | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuvei | Full-Stack PSP | Global + 50+ local acquiring | 700+ | No | T+2 - T+7 (custom) | Hybrid % + fixed | Single API + SDK | 7.8 |
| Finera | Payment Orchestrator | Global | 600+ | Yes | Depends on connected | Revenue share + routing fee | Single API | 7.8 |
| Solidgate | Orchestration + Acquiring | Global + LATAM/APAC | 300+ | Yes | T+1 - Real-time | Hybrid % | Single API | 7.8 |
| Primer | Payment Orchestrator | Europe + global | 200+ | Yes | Depends on PSP | Revenue share | Single API + UI | 7.6 |
| Adyen | Enterprise PSP | Global | 250+ | No | T+1 - T+3 | Hybrid % + interchange | Single API + SDK | 7.5 |
| Trustly | Open Banking PSP | Europe (30+ countries) | — | No | T+1 | Revenue share | Single API | 7.3 |
| Corefy | Payment Orchestrator | High-risk global | 600+ | Yes | Depends | Revenue share | Single API | 7.3 |
| Inpay | Payout Specialist | Global (90+ countries) | 90+ | No | Instant / T+1 | Custom | Single API | 7.2 |
| Paysafe | Full-Stack PSP | Europe + LATAM + 120+ countries | 260+ | No | T+3 | Hybrid % + revenue share | Single API | 7.0 |
| NOWPayments | Crypto Gateway | Global | 425+ | Yes | Instant (crypto) / T+1-3 | % per transaction | Single API + plugins | 6.8 |
Explore by Category
Payment Gateways
Gateway providers ranked, with integration specs and pricing
Payment Processing
How processing works in iGaming, plus top processors
Payment Methods
Cards, e-wallets, crypto, bank transfers — all compared
Crypto Payments
Crypto gateways for iGaming, regulation status, provider list
Challenges & Risk
Fraud, chargebacks, bank declines, and what actually fixes them
How to Choose
A checklist for picking the right payment provider
Payment Platforms
All-in-one platforms vs modular setups
Compliance
AML, KYC, PCI DSS, PSD2 — what operators need to know
Payment Solutions by Region
Europe accounts for the largest share of regulated iGaming traffic, and the payment stack reflects that. PSD2 and Strong Customer Authentication changed the game for card payments — operators now lean heavily on open banking providers like Trustly and Zimpler to keep conversion rates up. SEPA instant transfers cover most of the EU, but country-level preferences still matter: Sofort in Germany, iDEAL in the Netherlands, Swish in Sweden. Any provider you pick needs to handle multi-currency across EUR, GBP, SEK, NOK, and CHF at minimum.
How We Score Providers
Six metrics, all from public data
Every provider in this directory gets a score from 1 to 10. The score is based on six metrics, all pulled from public data — provider websites, regulatory registries, and API documentation. No provider can pay to change their score.
How many alternative payment methods does the provider support? A PSP with 700+ APMs scores higher than one with 50. We count cards, e-wallets, bank transfers, crypto, mobile payments, and prepaid options separately.
Number of countries and regions where the provider has active acquiring or direct integrations. "Available in 200+ countries" on a marketing page doesn't count — we verify through documentation and supported currency lists.
Tier-1 licenses (MGA, UKGC, FCA) carry more weight than offshore licenses. PCI DSS Level 1 certification is expected at this level. Providers with multiple jurisdictional approvals score higher because they give operators more flexibility.
How fast do funds reach the operator? Instant settlement scores a 10. T+1 is solid. Anything beyond T+2 in 2025 puts you behind your competitors.
Public API documentation, sandbox environments, SDKs, pre-built plugins, and no-code options. We check if the documentation actually exists and whether a developer can realistically integrate within the stated timeframe.
If pricing is published on the website, full marks. "Contact sales" with zero public information gets a 3. Partial disclosure falls in between. Operators shouldn't have to sit through a demo to learn whether a provider fits their budget.
The final score is a weighted average across all six metrics. We update scores quarterly or when a provider launches a significant product change.
Featured placements are paid. Scores are independent and not influenced by commercial relationships.
Understanding iGaming Payment Solutions
Types of Payment Providers
The iGaming payment space has four types of providers, and they do different things.
Payment Service Providers (PSPs) handle the full transaction — from the player's card or wallet to the operator's bank account. Paysafe, Nuvei, and Worldpay are PSPs. They own the relationship with acquiring banks and card networks, which means they take on the risk and charge accordingly.
Payment Gateways sit between the operator's platform and one or more processors. They route transactions but don't process them directly. Think of a gateway as a switchboard — it sends each transaction to the best available processor based on region, payment method, or success rate. Checkout.com operates partly as a gateway.
Payment Orchestrators go a step further than gateways. Platforms like Corefy and Praxis connect to hundreds of PSPs, gateways, and processors through a single API. The operator integrates once and gets access to multiple providers, with smart routing that automatically picks the best path for each transaction. Orchestration matters when you're operating in 10+ markets with different payment preferences in each.
Payment Processors handle the actual movement of money between banks. They're the backend infrastructure. Most operators don't work with processors directly — they access processing through a PSP or gateway. North and Shift4 are examples of companies that offer direct processing for iGaming.
The lines between these categories blur. Nuvei is a PSP that also does orchestration. Corefy orchestrates but also processes. When you're evaluating providers, focus less on what they call themselves and more on what they actually do for your specific setup.
Common Payment Challenges in iGaming
Payments in iGaming are harder than payments in regular e-commerce. Three reasons.
First, chargebacks. iGaming has some of the highest chargeback rates of any industry. Players dispute deposits after losing. Card networks monitor chargeback ratios closely, and if an operator crosses the threshold (typically 1% of transactions), they risk losing their merchant account entirely. Every provider handles chargebacks differently — some offer prevention tools, some offer insurance, some just pass the cost to you.
Second, getting a merchant account in the first place. Most acquiring banks consider online gambling high-risk. That limits which processors will work with you, and the ones that will charge higher fees and impose rolling reserves (holding 5-10% of your processing volume for 6+ months as security). This is why iGaming-specific providers exist — they've built relationships with acquiring banks that understand the industry.
Third, compliance keeps changing. The EU's Sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive added new requirements for transaction monitoring. The UK's Gambling Commission updated its rules on affordability checks, which directly affect payment flows. Brazil just launched its regulatory framework. Every market has its own rules, and your payment provider needs to keep up — or you're the one paying fines.
Beyond these three, there are practical problems: multi-currency conversion costs eating into margins, slow settlement times tying up working capital, and player verification requirements that add friction to the deposit flow and kill conversion rates.
Choosing the Right Payment Solution
There's no single best provider. The right choice depends on where you operate, what your players expect, and how much volume you're processing.
Start with geography. If you're launching in Brazil, you need a provider with native Pix support — not one that routes Pix through a third-party aggregator. If you're in the Nordics, open banking through Trustly or Zimpler will convert better than card payments. If you're US-only, your provider list is short because few processors serve regulated US gambling.
Then look at your player base. Recreational casino players in Europe expect Visa and Mastercard. High-volume sports bettors in Asia use local bank transfers. Crypto-native players want Bitcoin deposits with instant confirmation. The payment methods your provider supports determine whether players actually complete their first deposit.
Volume matters for pricing. A startup processing €100K per month pays different rates than an operator doing €10M. Most PSPs have tiered pricing that drops as volume increases. Some charge flat percentage fees, others add per-transaction costs. Get quotes from at least three providers before committing.
Finally, think about what happens when things go wrong. Your provider's chargeback handling, fraud prevention, and customer support matter more than their marketing page. Ask for chargeback rates across their iGaming portfolio. Ask how fast their support responds to MID-related emergencies. Ask what happens to your funds if they decide to terminate your account.
We built this directory so operators can compare these factors without calling 30 sales teams. Use the filters, check the profiles, and make a shortlist based on data, not pitch decks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are you a payment provider?
Get listed in our directory for free and reach iGaming operators looking for payment solutions.
Get listed for freeWant featured placement?
Promote your payment solution to operators actively searching for providers.
See advertising options