Skip to content
iGaming Payment SolutionsiGaming Payment Solutions

Updated

iGaming Payment Solutions

Europe

Independent directory of payment providers for iGaming operators. Filter by region, payment type, and license.

Top Rated Providers

Nuvei processes for Bet365, DraftKings and FanDuel. Adyen cleared €1.39 trillion last year. The top of this list isn't populated by startups with nice websites. These are the providers that process real iGaming volume at scale.

  1. 01Nuvei

    Nuvei

    iGaming-friendly

    DraftKings and FanDuel process through Nuvei. Taken private by Advent International for $6.3B in November 2024, headquartered in Montreal, 2,700+ employees. 720+ payment methods across 50+ local acquiring markets with AI-driven routing. Six pre-built iGaming platform connectors, more than any other provider in our review. Pricing is enterprise-tier, though: it starts at a $500k monthly minimum with a 5-10% rolling reserve held for six months. 3.8/5 Trustpilot from 828 reviews.

    EU, NA, LA, AS, ME, AF, GL720+ APMsT+7+3.8
    8.8/10
  2. 02Paysafe

    Paysafe

    iGaming-friendly

    With 50 million active Skrill and Neteller wallet users already onboard, Paysafe offers something no other iGaming PSP can match: a built-in player base. Part of Paysafe Group, publicly traded, London-headquartered since 1996. 260+ payment methods across 120+ countries. Clients include 888, PokerStars and William Hill. 1.2/5 Trustpilot from 1,132 reviews tells a complicated story.

    EU, NA, LA260+ APMs1.2
    8.2/10
  3. 03Worldpay

    Worldpay

    iGaming-friendly

    Owned by Global Payments since January 2026, processing card payments since 1997. Ladbrokes and Coral built their online deposit systems on Worldpay. 300+ payment methods focused on UK and European card acquiring. 4.3/5 Trustpilot from 10,022 reviews, most reviewed provider in our database. 9,400+ employees. The $750k minimum monthly volume and 8-15% rolling reserve make the cost of entry steep.

    EU, NA, LA, AS, ME300+ APMs4.3
    8.0/10
  4. 04Adyen

    Adyen

    Regulated-only

    Adyen is the largest independent payment processor in Europe. EUR 1.39 trillion processed in 2025, EUR 2.36 billion revenue, publicly traded on Euronext Amsterdam at a EUR 30 billion market cap. Single platform built in-house with banking licenses in the EU, UK and USA. 250+ payment methods across 150+ currencies. Forrester's top-rated merchant payment provider in Q1 2024. In April 2026, Adyen made its first-ever acquisition: Talon.One for EUR 750M. The constraint is positioning: Adyen treats iGaming as just another merchant category. No dedicated gambling product, no named casino clients beyond Betfair, no platform connectors for SoftSwiss or Slotegrator. If you process $1M+ monthly and want raw payment infrastructure at enterprise scale, few processors match Adyen. If you need a partner that understands gambling-specific problems, Nuvei and Paysafe are better positioned.

    EU, NA, LA, AS, ME, AF, GL250+ APMs1.3
    7.9/10
  5. 05Trustly

    Trustly

    Regulated-only

    Trustly is the open banking payment method that every major European casino already offers. Bet365, Flutter, Kindred, Betsson, Entain, LeoVegas. If your players are in Europe, they expect to see Trustly on the deposit page. Pay N Play lets players register and deposit in a single step through bank authentication, which changed how Nordic casinos operate. $239 million in revenue, $87 billion processed in 2024 (over $100 billion in 2025), connected to 6,300+ European banks and 12,000+ globally. The downsides are real too: 2.9/5 on Trustpilot from 3,187 reviews, a SEK 130 million AML fine from the Swedish regulator in 2022, and a $300k minimum volume requirement with 12-month contracts.

    EU0+ APMs2.9
    7.6/10

Quick Picks

Top providers for specific markets and needs

Top 10 iGaming Payment Providers Compared

Ranked by integration quality, fees, coverage, and compliance

Where to Dig Deeper

Four product hubs. Four regions. Read these before you talk to a sales rep.

Payment Solutions by Region

PSD2 killed card conversion in Europe. LATAM banks decline 40-60% of international cards. Each region has a payment problem and a set of providers that solve it.

Card conversion in European iGaming dropped after PSD2 forced Strong Customer Authentication on every deposit. Open banking filled the gap. Trustly processes for Bet365, Flutter, Betsson and most major European operators. Brite is the newer Stockholm-built alternative pushing instant payouts. Outside of open banking, country-level preferences run the show: iDEAL in the Netherlands, Sofort in Germany, Swish in Sweden, Bancontact in Belgium. A provider that covers ‘Europe’ but only does cards is missing half the deposit volume.

How We Score Providers

Five weighted metrics, all from public data

Every provider in this directory gets a score from 1 to 10. The score is based on five weighted metrics, all pulled from public data: provider websites, regulatory registries, and API documentation. Trustpilot is shown too, but it carries no weight. No provider can pay to change their score.

iGaming Fit
30%

Does the provider serve iGaming as a primary vertical? We check for dedicated iGaming teams, pre-built casino platform connectors (SoftSwiss, EveryMatrix, Slotegrator), named gambling clients, and whether their product roadmap prioritizes operator needs. A provider with 500+ gambling clients and 6 platform connectors scores higher than one that lists iGaming as an afterthought. A large owned gambling-acquiring book also counts, so a tier-1 acquirer is not under-rated for listing only the connectors it directly certified.

Geographic Coverage
22%

Where does the provider actually have local acquiring or direct integrations? We parse region descriptions and verify against supported currency lists and documentation. Global coverage with 50+ local markets scores highest. A LATAM-only specialist gets credit for depth in that region but lower marks for overall reach. Providers that own no direct acquiring of their own (orchestrators, aggregators, routing wallets) are capped here, since inherited reach is not owned reach.

Security & Compliance
20%

Tier-1 licenses carry the most weight: MGA, FCA, UKGC. PCI DSS Level 1 is expected at this level. We also check for KYC/AML automation, chargeback protection tools, and whether the provider supports operators under specific gambling regulatory frameworks. Providers with multiple jurisdictional approvals score higher.

Fees & Pricing
16%

Lower published fees score higher. We parse actual fee percentages from provider data. A 0.5% deposit fee scores better than 3.5%. Transparent pricing models get a bonus over opaque 'contact sales' approaches. Note: orchestrators show only routing fees, not underlying PSP costs, which can inflate this score.

Tech & Integration
12%

Single API integration with full sandbox scores highest. We check documentation quality, SDK availability, pre-built connectors, and realistic onboarding timelines. A provider that gets you live in 1 week with excellent docs scores better than one requiring 8 weeks of custom engineering.

The final score is a weighted average of the five weighted metrics. We update scores quarterly or when a provider launches a significant product change.

Payment Service Providers (PSPs) handle the full transaction, moving money from the player's card or wallet all the way to the operator's bank account. Paysafe, Nuvei, and Worldpay are PSPs. They own the relationship with acquiring banks and card networks, which means they take on the risk and charge accordingly.

Payment Gateways sit between the operator's platform and one or more processors. They route transactions but don't process them directly. A gateway works like a switchboard, sending each transaction to the best available processor based on region, payment method, or success rate. Adyen and Worldpay operate partly as gateways alongside their acquiring business.

Payment Orchestrators go a step further than gateways. Platforms like Corefy, Finera, Primer, and IXOPAY connect to hundreds of PSPs, gateways, and processors through a single API. The operator integrates once and gets access to multiple providers, with smart routing that automatically picks the best path for each transaction. Orchestration matters when you're operating in 10+ markets with different payment preferences in each.

Payment Processors handle the actual movement of money between banks. They're the backend infrastructure. Most operators don't work with processors directly. Instead, they access processing through a PSP or gateway. IXOPAY is an example of a company that offers an orchestration layer routing to multiple processors for iGaming.

The lines between these categories blur. Nuvei is a PSP that also does orchestration. Corefy orchestrates but also processes. When you're evaluating providers, focus less on what they call themselves and more on what they actually do for your specific setup.

Common Payment Challenges in iGaming

Payments in iGaming are harder than payments in regular e-commerce. Three reasons.

First, chargebacks. iGaming has some of the highest chargeback rates of any industry. Players dispute deposits after losing. Card networks monitor chargeback ratios closely, and if an operator crosses the threshold (typically 1% of transactions), they risk losing their merchant account entirely. Every provider handles chargebacks differently. Some offer prevention tools, some offer insurance, some just pass the cost to you.

Second, getting a merchant account in the first place. Most acquiring banks consider online gambling high-risk. That limits which processors will work with you, and the ones that will charge higher fees and impose rolling reserves (holding 5-10% of your processing volume for 6+ months as security). This is why iGaming-specific providers exist. They've built relationships with acquiring banks that understand the industry.

Third, compliance keeps changing. The EU's Sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive added new requirements for transaction monitoring. The UK's Gambling Commission updated its rules on affordability checks, which directly affect payment flows. Brazil just launched its regulatory framework. Every market has its own rules, and your payment provider needs to keep up. Otherwise, you're the one paying fines.

Beyond these three, there are practical problems: multi-currency conversion costs eating into margins, slow settlement times tying up working capital, and player verification requirements that add friction to the deposit flow and kill conversion rates.

Choosing the Right Payment Solution

There's no single best provider. The right choice depends on where you operate, what your players expect, and how much volume you're processing.

Start with geography. If you're launching in Brazil, you need a provider with native Pix support, not one that routes Pix through a third-party aggregator. If you're in the Nordics, open banking through Trustly or Brite will convert better than card payments. If you're US-only, your provider list is short because few processors serve regulated US gambling.

Then look at your player base. Recreational casino players in Europe expect Visa and Mastercard. High-volume sports bettors in Asia use local bank transfers. Crypto-native players want Bitcoin deposits with instant confirmation. The payment methods your provider supports determine whether players actually complete their first deposit.

Volume matters for pricing. A startup processing €100K per month pays different rates than an operator doing €10M. Most PSPs have tiered pricing that drops as volume increases. Some charge flat percentage fees, others add per-transaction costs. Get quotes from at least three providers before committing.

Finally, think about what happens when things go wrong. Your provider's chargeback handling, fraud prevention, and customer support matter more than their marketing page. Ask for chargeback rates across their iGaming portfolio. Ask how fast their support responds to MID-related emergencies. Ask what happens to your funds if they decide to terminate your account.

We built this directory so operators can compare these factors without calling 30 sales teams. Use the filters, check the profiles, and make a shortlist based on data, not pitch decks.

FAQ

Built from real conversations with operators. Not the questions providers wish you'd ask.

Insights & Guides

In-depth pieces on iGaming payment selection, comparison, and compliance written by people who run the math, not by the providers themselves.